Why I Never Let the Model Touch the Numbers
I let AI run almost everything in my business. The one line I won't move: it never decides the numbers.
Read →FOLLOW A THREAD
Acquisition, underwriting, and the decisions behind a real-estate deal.
Oldest first. Follow how the thinking developed.I let AI run almost everything in my business. The one line I won't move: it never decides the numbers.
Read →I have automated most of this business. One number still resists: what a rehab actually costs me. Why I stopped trying to close that gap, and started treating it as a measurement of the moat.
Read →Rehab cost resists the automation. Treating that limit as a boundary changed how I use the tools around it.
Read →The underwriting engine stopped picking a winner. It measures every exit against my buy box and flags thin comps, and the exit choice is mine and on the record.
Read →A flat wholetail percentage was off by about 20 points either way, so each estimate now carries its own wholetail number. Finished jobs get a short debrief on what ran over.
Read →My underwriting engine used to pick the exit and save it like I'd chosen it. Now it measures every exit and I make the call, on the record.
Read →What a seller tells me now gets captured in one place, confirmed field by field, and turned into a plan for the next conversation. It never changes a number.
Read →My leads moved onto my phone, texting counts as a contact try, and a lead now finds its own deal. Starting a new deal shows open leads ready to underwrite.
Read →